NOTICE.

The Editor defers till the completion of his undertaking any general remarks that he may have to offer.

PREFACE.

THE literature of the Hindus has now been cultivated, for many years, with singular diligence, and, in many of its branches, with eminent success. There are some departments, however, which are yet but partially and imperfectly investigated; and we are far from being in possession of that knowledge which the authentic writings of the Hindus alone can give us of their religion, mythology, and historical traditions.

From the materials to which we have hitherto had access, it seems probable that there have been three principal forms in which the religion of the Hindus has existed, at as many different periods. The duration of those periods, the circumstances of their succession, and the precise state of the national faith at each season, it is not possible to trace with any approach to accuracy. The premises have been too imperfectly determined to authorize other than conclusions of a general and somewhat vague description; and those remain to be hereafter confirmed, or corrected, by more extensive and satisfactory research.

The earliest form under which the Hindu religion appears is that taught in the Vedas. The style of the language, and the purport of the composition, of those

works, as far as we are acquainted with them, indicate a date long anterior to that of any other class of Sanskrit writings. It is yet, however, scarcely safe to advance an opinion of the precise belief, or philosophy, which they inculcate. To enable us to judge of their tendency, we have only a general sketch of their ar rangement and contents, with a few extracts, by Mr. Colebrooke, in the Asiatic Researches;1 a few incidental observations by Mr. Ellis, in the same miscellany;2 and a translation of the first book of the Samhitá, or collection of the prayers of the Rig-veda, by Dr. Rosen;3 and some of the Upanishads, or speculative treatises, attached to, rather than part of, the Vedas, by Rammohun Roy.** Of the religion taught in the Vedas, Mr. Colebrooke's opinion will probably be received as that which is best entitled to deference; as, certainly, no Sanskrit scholar has been equally conversant with the original works. "The real doctrine of the whole Indian scripture is the unity of the deity, in whom the

1 Vol. VIII., p. 369. †

2 Vol. XIV., p. 37.

3 Published by the Oriental Translation Fund Committee. 4 A translation of the principal Upanishads was published, under the title of Oupnekhat, or Theologia Indica, by Anquetil du Perron; but it was made through the medium of the Persian, and is very incorrect and obscure. A translation of a very different character has been some time in course of preparation by M. Poley.

*

To insert here a list of the numerous publications bearing on the Vedas, that have appeared since the date of this preface, 1840, would be beside the purpose of my notes.

Reprinted in Colebrooke's Miscellaneous Essays, Vol. I., pp. 9-113. + The kindness of Professor Wilson here mistook a hope for a reality.