Hidden fields
Books Books
" For myself, I believe the principle of law may be very plainly stated, and that is, that nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else. "
Atlantic Reporter - Page 444
1906
Full view - About this book

The Supreme Court Reporter, Volume 21

1901 - 958 pages
...slight modification. The case was held to fall within the principle, as put by the Lord Chancellor, "that nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." Lord Herschell, referring to Wotherspoon T. Currie, LR 5 HL 508, said : "The name 'Glenfield' had become...
Full view - About this book

The Chemical Trade Journal and Oil, Paint and Colour Review, Volume 18

1896 - 472 pages
...former decisions to disentangle what is decided as fact and what is laid down as a principle of law. For myself I believe the principle of law may be very...represent his goods as the goods of somebody else. How far the use of particular words, signs, or pictures does or does not come up to the proposition...
Full view - About this book

The American Law Register and Review, Volume 45

1897 - 914 pages
...recently ruled, that the principle announced in Reddaway v. Banhaai, T^IT' [I89fi] A- C- '99. 204, 1896, that "nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." has no limit as regards name, origin, honesty of manufacture or sale, or otherwise ; and that a trader...
Full view - About this book

Lawyers' Reports Annotated, Book 41

1898 - 918 pages
...one sentence in the first paragraph of the lord chancellor's speech moving the judgment of the house: 'Nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else.' Observe that the proposition is perfectly general. There is no limit as regards name, oripin, honesty...
Full view - About this book

Congressional Serial Set

1899 - 804 pages
...one sentence in the first paragraph of the Lord Chancellor's speech moving the judgment of the House, "Nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." Observe that the proposition is perfectly general. There is no limit as regards name, origin, honesty...
Full view - About this book

Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in ...

United States. Patent Office - 1899 - 812 pages
...one sentence in the lirst paragraph of the Lord Chancellor's speech moving the judgment of the House, ''Nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else.'' Observe that the proposition is perfectly general. There is no limit as regards name, origin, honesty...
Full view - About this book

Ruling Cases, Volume 25

Robert Campbell - 1901 - 864 pages
...former decisions to disentangle what is decided as fact and what is laid down as a principle of law. For myself, I believe the principle of law may be...represent his goods as the goods of somebody else. How far the use of particular words, signs, or pictures does or does not come up to the proposition...
Full view - About this book

United States Circuit Courts of Appeals Reports: With Key-number Annotations ...

1901 - 914 pages
...Halsbury, in delivering his opinion in the house of lords, stated that the case rested on the principle "that nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else" (page 204), and Lord Herschell said: "In my opinion, the doctrine on which the Judgment of the court...
Full view - About this book

The Ontario Law Reports: Cases Determined in the Court of Appeal ..., Volume 39

1917 - 684 pages
...p. 284. And in a former passage in the judgment he defines the false representation thus (p. 283): "Nobody has any right to represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." In none of the three instances deposed to, was any one deceived by the "get-up;" and, when the articles...
Full view - About this book

Les recueils de jurisprudence du Québec, publiés par le Barreau de ..., Volume 1

Québec (Province). Superior Court - 1902 - 642 pages
...Reddaway v. Banham (LR (1896), AC 199), known as the " Camel Hair Belting " case, where he says : — " For myself, I believe the principle of law may be...represent his goods as the goods of somebody else." In the case of Saxlehner v. Apollinaris Company, Kekewich, J. (LR, 1 Ch. Div., 893), in commenting...
Full view - About this book




  1. My library
  2. Help
  3. Advanced Book Search
  4. Download EPUB
  5. Download PDF