The Bible in the Public Schools: Arguments in the Case of John D. Minor Et Al. Versus the Board of Education of the City of Cincinnati Et Al. : Superior Court of Cincinnati : with the Opinions and Decision of the Court
Minor, John, Plaintiff. The Bible in the Public Schools: Arguments in the Case Of John D. Minor et al. versus The Board Of Education of the City of Cincinnati et al.: Superior Court of Cincinnati. With The Opinions and Decision of the Court. Cincinnati: Robert Clarke & Co. 1870. 420 pp. [With] The Board of Education of the City of Cincinnati v. John D. Minor Et. Al. 43 pp. Reprinted 2005 by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. ISBN 1-58477-514-9. Hardcover. * In 1868 the school board of the City of Cincinnati ended the practice of reading passages of the King James Bible in classrooms. Immediately challenged in the Superior Court, the school board's decision was revoked, in part, on the grounds that the readings were non-sectarian. In a ringing dissent, Justice Alphonso Taft, the father of William Howard Taft, declared: "This great principle of equality in the enjoyment of religious liberty, and the faithful preservation of the rights of each individual conscience is important in itself, and is essential to religious peace and temporal prosperity, in any country under a free government. But in a city and State whose people have been drawn from the four quarters of the world, with a great diversity of inherited religious opinions, it is indispensable" (417). The Ohio Supreme Court overturned on appeal. The latter decision and Taft's dissent were cited favorably by the U.S. Supreme Court in Abbington v. Schempp. With a new appendix containing the decision of the Ohio Supreme Court.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
admitted appropriate singing argument Assembly authority believe Bill of Rights Board of Education Christian religion Christianity Cincinnati ct Cincinnati et al citizens civil claim clause common law common schools Constitution counsel Court declared defendants discretion divine doctrine duty Education of Cincinnati enforce enjoined equally essential established exclusive faith Holy Bible Honors human infidel injunction institutions interfere Judge Storer legislative Legislature liberty matter Matthews means of instruction ment Minor ct Minor et al mode morality and knowledge object Ohio opinion parents persecution plaintiffs principles prohibited proposition Protestant Protestantism public schools pupils purpose question reading refer regard religious denomination religious instruction religious truth repealed resolutions rights of conscience Roman Catholic Roman Catholic Church rule sacred School Board school fund schools of Cincinnati Scriptures sectarian sects secular sense society spirit statute taught teachers things tion true virtue words
Page 44 - GOD, and for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion and morality, in all cases where such provision shall not be made voluntarily.
Page 39 - Religion, morality and knowledge, however, being essential to good government, it shall be the duty of the General Assembly to pass suitable laws to protect every religious denomination in the peaceable enjoyment of its own mode of public worship, and to encourage schools and the means of instruction.
Page 39 - The general assembly shall make such provisions, by taxation or otherwise, as, with the income arising from the school trust fund, will secure a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the state ; but no religious or other sect, or sects, shall ever have any exclusive right to, or control of, any part of the school funds of this state.