Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

Ver. 7. The command to multiply is repeated, and contains permission, not of promiscuous intercourse, like the brutes, but of honourable marriage. The same law which forbad the eating of blood, under the gospel, forbad fornication, which was common among the heathen; and alas, too common among those who call themselves Christians !

Ver. 8-17. Having given the foregoing precepts, God graciously proceeds to enter into a solemn covenant with Noah and his posterity, and every living creature that was with them, no more to destroy them by water, of which the bow in the cloud was to be the token. The covenant is an amplification of what was said at the altar, where the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and indeed the first seventeen verses of this chapter are a continuation of that subject.

We see here, (1.) The mercy and goodness of God, in proceeding with us in a way of covenant. He might have exempted the world from this calamity, and yet not have told them he would do so. The remembrance of the flood might have been a sword hanging over their heads in terrorem. But he will set their minds at rest on this score and therefore promises, and that with an oath, that the waters of Noah should no more go over the earth.* Thus also he deals with us in his Son. Being willing that the heirs of promise should have strong consolation, he confirms his word by an oath.† (2.) The importance of living under the light of revelation. Noah's posterity by degrees sunk into idolatry, and became strangers to the covenants of promise. Such were our fathers for many ages, and such are great numbers to this day. So far as respects them, God might as well have made no promise to them all is lost. (3.) The importance of being believers. Without this, it will be worse for us than if we had never been favoured with a revelation.

ger it, the people will soon perceive that he is a selfish tyrant, and cares not for the general good; and if he regard only the public safety, punishing crimes merely on account of their being injurious to men, it is still a spirit of selfishness, only a little more extended; and God will disapprove of this, as the people do of the other.

[blocks in formation]

Finally: We see here the kind of life which it was God's design to encourage-a life of faith. The just shall live by faith. If he had made no revelation of himself, no covenants, and no promises, there would be no ground for faith; and we must have gone through life feeling after him, without being able to find him: but having made known his mind, there is light in all our dwellings, and a sure ground for believing, not only in our exemption from another flood, but in things of far greater importance.

With respect to the sign, or token, of this covenant, the bow in the cloud, as it seems to be the effect of causes which existed from the beginning, it is probable that that also existed; but it was not till now a token of God's covenant with the world. Such a token was extremely suitable, on account of its conspicuousness, and its appearance in the cloud, or at a time when the fears of man would be apt to rise, lest they should be overwhelmed with another flood. This being a sign of peace, the King of Zion is described as having a rainbow about his throne.

Ver. 18, 19. God having thus saved, counselled, and covenanted with this little company, Moses proceeds to narrate their history. In general, we are informed that the fathers of the new world were Noah's three sons, Shem and Ham and Japheth; from whom the earth was peopled. And having mentioned Ham, he says He was the father of Canaan. This remark of Moses was doubtless made with a special design; for living, as he did, when the Israelites, who descended from Shem, were about to take possession of the land of Canaan, it was of peculiar importance that they should be informed that the people whose country the Lord their God had given them to possess, were under a curse from the days of their first father. The particulars of this affair will appear in the sequel.

[ocr errors]

Ver. 20-23. Noah, as soon as he could get settled, betook himself to the employment of husbandry; and the first thing he did in this way was to plant a vineyard. So far all was right; man, as we have seen, was formed originally for an active, and not an idle life. Adam was ordered to keep the garden, and to dress it; and when fallen, to till the ground from whence he was taken, which now required much labour. Perhaps there is no employ

ment more free from snares.

[ocr errors]

But in the most lawful occupations

and enjoyments, we must not reckon ourselves out of danger. It was very lawful for Noah to partake of the fruits of his labour; but Noah sinned in drinking to excess. He might not be aware of the strength of the wine, or his age might render him sooner influenced by it: at any rate we have reason to conclude, from his gen. eral character, that it was a fault in which he was overtaken. But let us not think lightly of the sin of drunkenness. Who hath woe; who hath redness of eyes? They that TARRY LONG at the wine. Times of festivity require a double guard. Neither age nor char acter are any security in the hour of temptation. Who would have thought, that a man who had walked with God, perhaps more than five hundred years, and who had withstood the temptations of a world, should fall alone? This was like a ship which had gone round the world being overset in sailing into port. What need for watchfulness and prayer! One heedless hour may stain the fairest life, and undo much of the good which we have been doing for a course of years! Drunkenness is a sin which involves in it the breach of the whole law, which requires love to God, our neighbour, and ourselves. The first as abusing his mercies; the second. as depriving those who are in want of them of necessary support, as well as setting an ill example; and the last as depriving ourselves of reason, self-government, and common decency. It also commonly leads on to other evils. It has been said, and justly, that the name of this sin is Gad—a troop cometh!

But sinful as it was for Noah thus to expose himself, it was stil more so for Ham, on perceiving his situation, to go out and report it with malignant pleasure to his brethren. None but a fool wil make a mock at sin in any one: but for children to expose and sneer at the sin of their parents, is wickedness of the most aggravated kind. It indicates a heart thoroughly depraved. The conduct of Shem and Japheth on this unhappy occasion, was as commendable as the other was censurable, and as worthy of our imitation as that is of our abhorrence.

Ver. 24. When Noah came to himself, he knew what had been done by his younger son. Nothing is said of his grief for his own sin. I hope his anger did not turn merely against that of his son.

Nor are we to consider what follows as an ebullition of personal resentment, but as a prophecy, which was meant to apply, and has been ever since applying to his posterity, and which it was not possible for human resentment to dictate. But as this prophecy

is very comprehensive, and will lead us to take notice of some of the great principles of revelation, I shall reserve it for a future discourse.

DISCOURSE XV.

NOAH'S PROPHECY.

Gen. ix. 25-27.

It was common among the patriarchs, when about to die, to pronounce a prophetic sentence on their children, which frequently bore a relation to what had been their conduct, and extended to their remote posterity. This prophecy however, though not immediately after the flood, was probably many years before the death of Noah. I shall first attempt to ascertain its meaning, and its agreement with the great outlines of historic fact; and then endeavour to justify the ways of providence in such dispensations.

The prophecy is introduced with a curse upon the posterity of one of Noah's sons, and concludes with a blessing upon the other two; each corresponding with his conduct on the late unhappy occasion.

:

Cursed be Canaan: a servant of servants, that is, the meanest of servants, shall he be unto his brethren. But why is the name of Ham omitted, and the curse confined to his son Canaan? Some suppose that Canaan must have been in some way partaker in the crime but this is uncertain. It is thought by several able critics that instead of Canaan we should read, as it is in ver. 22, Ham the father of Canaan ;* and this seems very plausible, as otherwise there is nothing said of Ham, except in the person of his son; and what is still more, the curse of servitude actually came, though at

.*

[ocr errors]

* Ainsworth says, " By Canaan may be understood or implied Canaan's father, as the Greek translation hath Ham, and as elsewhere in scripture, Goli ath is named for Goliath's father. 2 Sam. xxi. 19, compared with 1 Chron. XX. 5." See also Bishop Newton on the Prophecies. Dissert. I.

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »