Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

and pamphlets; which scruple not to call their opponents"knaves and blockheads," and to impute to them "infamous dishonesty," "despicable folly," "ridiculous nonsense, ""measureless absurdity;" and "to treat them with ineffable contempt." Remember the Apostolic precept, "In meekness instruct those that oppose themselves 1."

199

1 2 Tim. ii. 25.

LETTER VIII.

ON ARGUMENTS-THOSE DERIVABLE FROM

SCRIPTURE.

It does not fall in with my plan to give a philosophical analysis of the different sorts and divisions of arguments; for that I must refer you to the second chapter of Dr. Whately's Rhetoric, where the Archbishop treats, in his most luminous manner, a subject peculiarly adapted to his discriminating talent. All that I shall attempt will be to name the principal "tools" which are suited to the branch of oratory under our consideration.

The main strength of the preacher lies in a sort of argument peculiar to his branch, and that is, the Apodixis Biblica, or appeal to Scripture. In some respects, this is similar to the argument from authority, of which all moral writers may avail themselves; but Scriptural authority is, of course, of infi

[ocr errors]

other. To exemplify the

ײ

nitely greater weight than any other. difference ;-St. Paul, in addressing the Athenians on the overruling providence of God, says, "In him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also off your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring'.' As an argument, this could have but little force to compel the assent of the Athenians, since they acknowledged no Divine authority in their old poets. It was addressed to them as an illustration rather than a proof. But now, St. Paul having so applied the words, we, who believe in his inspiration, may use them as a conclusive evidence and undeniable proof of the providence of God. What was before the opinion of fallible men has now received the stamp of Divine authority; it is no longer the saying of the old poets, but the word of God. Considered in this point of view, the subject-matter of the preacher differs from that of all other speakers. Others speak merely on contingencies; for moral arguments, without the authority of Scripture, are but a balance of probabilities; but a proof founded on Scripture authority, or legitimately deduced from Scripture, is equal in certainty to a mathematical demonstration. The Christian preacher, therefore, adopts a tone suitable to the character of his subject. "While the Roman orator," says Mr. Benson, "proceeds slowly and insecurely, faltering at every step, and evidently doubtful to

1 Acts xvii. 28.

what his reasonings may lead, the Christian inquirer assumes a bolder and more erect attitude, treads the ground as if he felt conscious of its firmness'." "Thus saith the Lord," is for him an absolute and conclusive authority, both for doctrine and precept: and though it may not be right for a preacher to confine himself to Scripture proof, yet there are many topics on which he will need no other syllogism, nor require any process of reasoning. A single undoubted text of Scripture will be enough.

And in the appeal to Scripture the preacher has this advantage over all other reasoners, that he meets his hearers on a wide field of common ground. There is an inexhaustible fund of propositions in common between them; for, although it may be said that many parts of Scripture are disputed by controversialists, yet there still remain an infinite number on which there can be no difference of opinion between a church-congregation and their pastor. These propositions are the ground-work of his reasoning, and pervade every part of his discourse. Not only does he bring them forward as directly proving the point that he wishes to establish, but uses them as premises, whereon to found other arguments for the same purpose. In most sermons by far the majority of arguments may be, directly or indirectly, traced to Scriptural authority.

1 Benson's Hulsean Lectures, Lect. iv. vol. ii. p. 78.

In the constant use of Scriptural authority there is also a moral effect, which with many congregations will conduce to persuasion. Religious persons, habitually conversant with Scripture, justly complain if there be too much of “the words of man's wisdom" in an address from the pulpit.

Arguments from Scripture have also this advantage, that they are direct. God loveth us, therefore we Ishould love him. Christ died to redeem us, therefore we are his. Christ came to set an example, therefore we should follow it. The grace of God hath appeared, therefore we should deny ungodliness and worldly lusts, and live righteously and soberly in this present world'. There will, undoubtedly, be a resurrection and a judgment, therefore "be ye stedfast, unmoveable" admit the premises, and there is no mode of escaping the conclusion.

For the use and success of scriptural argument we have abundant evidence in the practice of the first preachers of Christianity. Of the convincing eloquence of Apollos we have already spoken. In the speeches of St. Peter and St. Stephen, you find constant quotations from Scripture, and appeals to the historical and prophetical writings of the Old Testament; so also in the Epistles of St. Paul,-not only in proof that Jesus was the Christ, but as authority for many minor points of belief and practice. "Say I these things as a man?

1 Titus ii. 12.

21 Cor. xv. 58.

« PreviousContinue »