...be superfluous, and ought to be rejected. To suppport the above construction, it is said, that the verb may be understood as applied to each of the preceding...salt, and a mass of iron, is easier to bear than a W\an without understanding." But besides the confusion, and the latitude of application which such...

...be superfluous, and ought to be rejected. To suppport the above construction, it is said, that the verb may be understood as applied to each of the preceding...following example. " Sand, and salt, and a mass of iron, ii easier to bear than a man without understanding." But besides the confusion, and the latitude of...

...ought to be rejefted. To fupport the above conftruction, it is faid, that the verb may be underftood as applied to each of the preceding terms ; as in the following example. " Sand, and fait, and a mafs of iron, is eafier to bear than a man without underftanding." But befides the confufion,...

...disquieted with madness. 275. What is heavier than lead ? and what is the name thereof but a fool ? 270. Sand, and salt, and a mass of iron, is easier to bear than a man without understanding. 277. As timber girt and bound together in a building cannot be loosed with shaking ; so the heart that...

...must be superfluous, and ought to be rejected. To support the above construction, it is said that the verb may be understood as applied to each of the preceding...salt, and a mass of iron is easier to bear than a man with<mt understanding." But besides the confusion, and the latitude of application, which such a construction...

...each of the preceding terms; as in the following example. " Sand, and salt, and a mass of iron, it easier to bear than a man • without understanding."...latitude of application, which such a construction %vould introduce, it appears to be more proper and analogical, in cases where the verb is intended...

...must be superfluous, and ought to be rejected. To support the above construction, it is said, that the verb may be understood as applied to each of the preceding terms ; as in the following example. " Bund, and salt, and a mass, of iron, is easier to bear ihun a man without understanding." Hut besides...

...must be superfluous, and ought to be rejected. To support the above construction, it is said, that fhe verb may be understood as applied to each of the preceding...mass of iron, is easier to bear than a man without understandmg." But besides the confusion, and the latitude ofapplication, which such a construction...

...be superfluous, and ought to be rejected. 'To support the above construction, it is said, that 'the 'verb may be understood as applied to each of the...bear than a man without understanding." But besides tire confusion, and the latitude of application, which such a construction would introduce, it appears...

...superfluous, and ought to he rejected. To support the ahove construction, it is said, that the verb may he understood as applied to each of the preceding terms..." Sand, and salt, and a mass of iron, is easier to hear lh .na man without understanding." But hesides the confusion, and the latitude of application,...