Shakespeare in Psychoanalysis
The link between psychoanalysis as a mode of interpretation and Shakespeare's works is well known. But rather than merely putting Shakespeare on the couch, Philip Armstrong focuses on the complex and fascinatingly fruitful mutual relationship between Shakespeare's texts and psychoanalytic theory. He shows how the theories of Freud, Rank, Jones, Lacan, Erikson, and others are themselves in a large part the product of reading Shakespeare.
Armstrong provides an introductory cultural history of the relationship between psychoanalytic concepts and Shakespearean texts.
This is played out in a variety of expected and unexpected contexts, including:
*the early modern stage
*Hamlet and The Tempest
*Freud's analytic session
*the Parisian intellectual scene
*the virtual space of the PC.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
according adolescence analysis appears argues aspects associated attempt authority becomes Black calls century chapter character Chavafambira claim colonial complex constitutes course critics cultural death demonstrates describes desire discussion drama dreams early modern emerges European example fantasy father feminine figure Freud Freudian function Hamlet human identify individual interpretation John Jones Juliet kind Lacan Lacanian later letter literary means memory mind mode moreover mother narrative nature notion object Oedipal offered once Ophelia original particular past play political position possible produced Prospero provides psychic psycho psychoanalytic psychological question Rank reading reference relation relationship remains repeats represents rhetoric role Romeo Sachs scene seems sense sexual Shakespeare Shakespeare in Love signifier social space speaks stage structure suggests symbolic theory thought turn unconscious writing