"Jesus, ever good and gentle, Wept our misery to see; "Phantoms of the night, arisen From the grave, we wander weary, In these walls our penance wailing: (Miserere! Miserere!) "It was sweet to lie entombed!Here, alas! how cold and dreary! And ah! the sunny fields of heaven! (Miserere! Miserere!) "Dearest Savior, O forgive us Our drear sin, for we are wearyLet us steal into thy heaven: (Miserere! Miserere!)" Thus in chorus sing the phantoms, A long-dead player plays-his fingers Jenny My years are thirty-five; upon you The suns of fifteen summers beam But every time I see you, Jenny, Years ago when I was twenty, I met a girl I thought was true; Her look . . . and all . . was just like yours She did her hair up just like you. And when I had to leave for college, I begged of her "to know my fate," At Göttingen three years I studied She had just married another man. Springtime was glad over field and forest,- But I alone was cold with anguish, And weak, it seemed, with a fatal blight. I suffered through that dreadful night. But I got over it. I'm healthy; My strength is like an oaken beam- I Dreamed a False Sweet Dream I dreamed a false sweet dream of youth that's squandered,— And hand in hand with my dear love I wandered, Her youth was cast about her like a vesture, Her voice was low and gentle; her sweet spirit It was not idle fancy flashed upon me; I did not rave-my heart was at command; But all her being meant to me, came on me, And lover-like I knelt and kissed her hand. I half-recall a lovely lily blossom, I think I plucked and laid it on her breast, She may have answered-but I do not know it. Here on my bed of death, a dying poet, Who have for years seen thus the morning break. A Verse for Youth Apples of gold o'er thy pathway are bending; As the heroes of old, fight the fight to its ending, To do and to dare-there all hope lies before thee- Earth's labor performed, every obstacle passed by us,- An Interlude All the pain with which I languish Here you see, as 'twere, the anguish THE POETIC TRAGEDY OF DANTE BY ROGER SHERMAN LOOMIS I am a devotee of the Middle Ages. Like Percival, I adored a knight the first time I saw one-in the pages of a picture book. When I read A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, I found that even an ancestry of Connecticut Yankees could not prevent my sympathies from going out to Arthur's Quixotic and picturesque companionship. For me, there is no book like a thirteenth century illuminated manuscript, no stained glass like the windows of Chartres, no university like Oxford, no drinking song like "Mihi est propositum in taberna mori," no lovers like Tristram and Ysolt. Though I can relish Back to Methuselah or Main Street, somehow I find a completer zest in Jurgen or Domnei, where the modern satirist decks himself in cockscomb and bauble or the modern lover disguises himself as Dan Cupido. Naturally the Divine Comedy fascinates me. But I cannot feel and think with Dante as I can with Chaucer or Langland or Villon or Gottfried von Strassburg or Petrarch. At least, it is only in those classic passages which all the world applauds that my mind and feeling yield wholly to the power of Dante's imagery and music. Perhaps this is my limitation; but I find almost universal among my acquaintance who genuinely love literature a sense that the Divine Comedy is a queer, a meaningless book. What is the explanation? Is Dante over our heads? Or have we left the thirteenth century, of which the Divine Comedy is the intellectual and moral expression, so far behind? Of course, there are those critics, particularly vocal during the sexcentenary, who, not content with displaying the eternity of Dante's poetic genius at its best, set out to demonstrate the modernity of Dante's ideas. Let us see if they are right. |