...below, interpreted the phrase as follows: "In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil/ discounted by its improbability, justifies...free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger." 183 F. 2d at 212. We adopt this statement of the rule. As articulated by Chief Judge Hand, it is as...

...below, interpreted the phrase as follows: "In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil,' discounted by its improbability, justifies...free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger." 183 F. 2d at 212. We adopt this statement of the rule. As articulated by Chief Judge Hand, it is as...

...first amendment rights only where "the gravity of the 'evil,' discounted by its improbability justified such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger." United States v. Dennis (183 F. 2d 201, 212), adopted in Dennis v. United States (341 US 494, 510)....

...that fiction is merely an unreal story. construed the doctrine to read, "whether the gravity of the 'evil', discounted by its improbability, justifies...free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger." Now, if there is no demonstrable causal relationship between reading and conduct, how can it be established...

...that fiction is merely an unreal story. construed the doctrine to read, "whether the gravity of the 'evil', discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary toavoid the danger." Now, if there is no demonstrable causal relationship between reading and conduct,...

...Div. 542, 547, 145 NYS2d 534, 538 (1955). In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the "evil," discounted by its improbability, justifies...invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger.150 The difficulty of analogizing this approach to the problems involved in limiting confrontation...

...by Judge Learned Hand in the court below: "In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil,' discounted by its improbability, justifies...free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger." 341 US 494 (1951), at 510. The immediacy requirement in Holmes's original test disappears in this formulation....

...marked a dismal low point of protection for free expression. "The gravity of the evil," Hand said, "discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger."18 The choice of that notoriously unsuccessful test led Benno Schmidt to describe the Nebraska...

...sustained unless the Court is convinced that "the gravity of the evil, discounted by its probability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger."" It seems unlikely that the Court would hold that the mere possibility of violating campaign finance...

...sustained unless the Court is convinced that "the gravity of the evil, discounted by its probability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger."4' It seems unlikely that the Court would hold that the mere possibility of violating campaign...