There is a stricter party of Christians amongst us, who speak out their opinions concerning the Sunday; this comprises what are commonly called the more "evangelical" sects. There is a party less strict in many particulars, comprising what are commonly called the more "liberal" sects. They have hitherto been comparatively silent on this theme. Their opinions about the Sunday have not usually been so plainly spoken out, but have been made apparent by their actions, by occasional and passing words, rather than by full, distinct, and emphatic declarations. The stricter party of late years have been growing a little more strict; the party less strict likewise advance in the opposite direction. Recently a call has been published by a few men for a convention to consult and take some steps towards the less rigid course, for the purpose, as I understand it, of making the Sunday even more valuable that it is now. I take it for granted that both parties desire to make the best possible use of the Sunday-the use most conducive to the highest interests of mankind ; that they desire this equally. There are good men on both sides, the more and the less strict, - pious men, in the best sense of that word, may be found on both sides. There is no need of imputing bad motives to either party in order to explain the dif ference between the two.

Such is the aspect of the two parties in the field, looking opposite ways, but at one another. It seems likely that there will be a quarrel, and, as is

usual in such cases, hard words on each side, hard thoughts and unkind feelings on both sides. Before the quarrel begins, and our eyes are blinded by the dust of controversy; before our blood is fired, and we become wholly incapable of judgmentlet us look coolly at the matter, and ask, Do we need any change in respect to the observance of the Sunday? Are the present opinions respecting the Origin, Nature, and original Design of that institution just and true? Is the present mode of observing it the most profitable that can be devised? The inquiry is one of great importance.

To answer these questions it is necessary to go back a little into the history of the Hebrew Sabbath and the Christian Sunday. However, it is not needful to go much into detail, or consume this precious hour in a learned discussion on antiquarian matters which concern none but scholars.

With the Hebrews the actual observance of Saturday, the Sabbath, as a day of rest, seems to be of pretty late origin. The first mention of it in authentic Hebrew history, as actually observed, occurs about two hundred years after Samuel, and about six hundred after Moses a little less than nine hundred before Christ. The passage is found in 2 Kings, iv. 23: a child had died, as the narrative relates, the mother wished to send for Elisha, "the man of God." Her husband objects, saying, "wherefore wilt thou go to him to-day? it is neither New Moon nor Sabbath." This connection with the New Moon is significant. In the earlier histor

ical books of Joshua, Judges, the two books of Samuel, and the first of Kings, there is no mention of the Sabbath,—not the least allusion to it.

This seems to have been the origin of its observance:-The worship of one God, with the distinctive name Jehovah, gradually got established in the Hebrew nation; for this they seem largely indebted to Moses. Gradually this worship of Jehovah became connected with a body of priests, who were regularly organized at length, and claimed descent from Levi-some of them from Aaron, his celebrated descendant, the elder brother of Moses. The rise of the Levitical priesthood is remarkable, and easily traced in the Old Testament. Some books are entirely destitute of a Levitical spirit, such as Genesis and Judges; others are filled with it, as Leviticus, Deuteronomy, and the books of Chronicles. With the priesthood it seems there came the observance of certain days for religious or festal purposes, - New Moon days, Full Moon days, and the like. These seem to have been derived from the nations about them, with whom the moon-deified as Astarte, the Queen and Mother of Heaven, and under other names-was long an object of worship. The observance of those days points back to the period when Fetichism, the worship of Nature, was the prominent form of religion. With the other days of religious observance came the seventh day, called the Sabbath. No one knows its true historical origin. The statement respecting its origin in the fourth command

ment, and elsewhere in the Old Testament, can hardly be accepted as literally true by any one in this century. No scientific man in the present stage of philosophic inquiry will believe that God created the universe in six days, and then rested on the seventh. Did other nations observe this day before the Hebrews; was it also connected with some fetichistic form of worship; what was the historical event which led to the selection of that day in special? This it is easy to ask, but perhaps not possible to answer. These are curious questions; they are of little practical importance to us at this moment.

After the Hebrew institutions of religion got fixed-the worship of Jehovah, the Levitical priesthood, and the peculiar forms of sacrificeit became common to refer their origin back to the time of Moses, a man who lived fourteen or fifteen hundred years before Christ. Since few memorials from his age have come down to us, it is plain we can know little of him. But from the impression which his character left on his nation, and through them on the whole world; from the myths so early connected with his name - it seems pretty clear that he was one of the greatest and most extraordinary men that ever lived. Mankind seldom tell great things of little men.

It is difficult

to say what share he had in making the laws of the Hebrew nation which are commonly referred to him, and, as it is popularly taught, revealed to him directly by Jehovah. Perhaps we are not safe

in referring to him even the whole of the Ten Commandments-surely not in any one of their present forms.* Was the Sabbath observed as a day of rest before Moses? Was its observance enforced by him? Was it ever known to him? These are questions not easily answered. This only is certain: from the time of Moses to that of Jehoram, a period of about six hundred years, there is no historical mention of its observance, not the least allusion to it. Yet we have documents which

treat of that period, the books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and the Kings, -some of them historical documents, which go into the minute detail of the national peculiarities, and were evidently written with a good deal of concern for strict integrity and truth; they refer to the national rite of circumcision. Now, if the Sabbath had been observed during that period, it is difficult to believe it would have received no passing notice in those historical books. But not only is there no mention of it therein, none even in the times of David and Solomon, who favored the priesthood so strongly ; but in the book of Chronicles, the most Levitical book in the Bible, at a date more than two hundred years later than the time of Jehoram, it is dis tinctly declared that the Sabbath had not been kept for nearly five hundred years. But even if this

*These celebrated commandments have come down to us in three distinct forms; namely, in Exodus xx., in Exodus xxxiv., and in Deut. v. The differences between these several codes are quite remarkable and significant.

† 2 Chron., xxxvi., 21.