...more than a year before the Supreme Court ruling. The Court reaffirmed the appellate courts' rulings that "the nature of our Federal Union and our constitutional...regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement." In the decision, known as Shapiro v. Thompson, the Court pointed out that "the prohibition...

...migration by needy persons into the State is constitutionally impermissible. This Court long ago recognized that the nature of our Federal Union and our constitutional...regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement. That Opinion of the Court. 394 US proposition was early stated by Chief Justice Taney in...

...recognized." And in Shapiro v. Thompson, cited above, the Court declared that it "long ago recognized that the nature of our Federal union and our constitutional...regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement." The connection between the enjoyment of this right and the enactment of a uniform law on...

...recognized." And in Shapiro v. Thompson, cited above, the Court declared that it "long ago recognized that the nature of our Federal union and our constitutional...regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement." The connection between the enjo3-ment of this right and the enactment of a uniform law on...

...ago recognized the nature of our Federal Union and our Constitutional concepts of personal Liberty require that all citizens be free to travel throughout...statutes, rules or regulations which unreasonably bur^"or restrict this movement. I*, at 629. The Court added: "More fundamentally, a State may no more...

...have \mconstitutionally interfered with the right to travel,11' I>T impeding its citizens' right to "be free to travel throughout the length and breadth...uninhibited by statutes, rules, or regulations which burden or restrict this movement." "* Although the cases speak specifically about a right to travel...

...have unconstitutionally interfered with the right to travel,114 by impeding its citizens' right to "be free to travel throughout the length and breadth...uninhibited by statutes, rules, or regulations which burden or restrict this movement." 115 Although the cases speak specifically about a right to travel...

...would have unconstitutionally interfered with the right to travel,1" by impeding its citizens' right to "be free to travel throughout the length and breadth...uninhibited by statutes, rules, or regulations which burden or restrict this movement." ' Although the cases speak specifically about a right to travel...

...And In Shapiro against Thompson, cited above, the Court declared that it ••Jong ago recognized that the nature of our Federal union and our constitutional...regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement" — 394 US 628. The connection between the enjoyment of this right and the enactment of a...

...reiterated its recognition of the right to travel from state to state: This Court long ago recognized that the nature of our Federal Union and our constitutional...regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement. 10 The Court again considered the issue of mobility as part of another great social movement...